<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>a.muse: Is Java Dead?</title>
    <link>http://www.jessirae.com/blog/articles/2006/01/19/is-java-dead</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Is Java Dead?</title>
      <description>&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://static.flickr.com/31/55229815_975ffcb2e8_m.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/center&gt; 

	&lt;p&gt;Well, Java isn&amp;#8217;t dead yet.  And I venture to guess that it will be quite a while before its in the grave.  Even Cobol is still alive&amp;#8230; so, Java has got a ways to go.   I think the fact that an &lt;a href="http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/22629.html"&gt;article was written&lt;/a&gt; &lt;strong&gt;in 2003&lt;/strong&gt; on whether or not java was dead is an indication that it is moving into the later stages of its life cycle.  But I&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:55:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:8bf7a8c5-dc42-45c2-a519-f2bf462d324e</guid>
      <author>closetmaster</author>
      <link>http://www.jessirae.com/blog/articles/2006/01/19/is-java-dead</link>
      <category>technology</category>
      <category>java</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.jessirae.com/blog/articles/trackback/37</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
