<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>a.muse: Tag philosophy</title>
    <link>http://www.jessirae.com/blog/articles/tag/philosophy</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>I know pain</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most of my philosophy posts reside on my &lt;a href="http://www.sandiferclassroom.com/blog/"&gt;other blog.&lt;/a&gt;  But I am very excited to announce &amp;#8211; to anyone who might stop by this more-tech-oriented blog &amp;#8211; that I have completed my master&amp;#8217;s thesis and &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DEGREE&lt;/span&gt; in philosophy from &lt;a href="http://www2.gsu.edu/~wwwphl/philosophy.html"&gt;Georgia State University&lt;/a&gt;.  Yea!&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I can now definitely say that I &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;know&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; pain.  I&amp;#8217;ve studied it, and I understand a bit more about the brain states involved with pain.  Reallly, I swear!  I &lt;em&gt;know&lt;/em&gt; pain.  You don&amp;#8217;t believe me, do you?  Well, if you are thinking that I am simply &lt;a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia-knowledge/#2"&gt;Mary&lt;/a&gt; the scientist, who has studied pain her entire life, but never experienced &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; pain, then you need to read &lt;a href="http://jessirae.com/blog/files/Kripke_Chalmers_and_Pain.pdf"&gt;my thesis.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


Here&amp;#8217;s the abstract&amp;#8230;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;
		&lt;p&gt;One common element of Kripke&amp;#8217;s and Chalmers’ reactions to physicalist theories of mind is their reliance upon the intuition that the concept of conscious experience is essentially identified by the “immediate phenomenal quality” of conscious experience or how an experience feels.  I examine how Kripke&amp;#8217;s and Chalmers’ critiques require that the concept of conscious experience be identified by how it feels and then move on to provide some ways in which this intuition about the concept of conscious experience could be wrong.  Specifically, the intuition is not consistent with our intuitions about unusual cases in pain science and does not take such cases to be genuine cases of pain. These inconsistencies weaken the intuition, making it difficult for any critique of identity theory or physicalism to rely heavily upon it.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Its title is &lt;em&gt;Kripke, Chalmers and the Immediate Phenomenal Quality of Pain&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:09:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:64117c31-a7de-4e72-9cb5-0922a4a22d2f</guid>
      <author>Jessica</author>
      <link>http://www.jessirae.com/blog/articles/2006/11/30/i-know-pain</link>
      <category>pain</category>
      <category>degree</category>
      <category>philosophy</category>
      <enclosure type="application/pdf" url="http://www.jessirae.com/blog/files/Kripke_Chalmers_and_Pain.pdf" length="57375"/>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.jessirae.com/blog/articles/trackback/724</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
